D1X & D1H: A Day at the Races
I spent a great weekend shooting the Monterey Historic car
races with a D1H and a D1X. I can't imagine two better cameras for the job.
First, both cameras produced great color right away and every time. Getting
the right color required the usual D1 maneuvering, in this case I shot with
Cloudy -3 even though the Sun was blazing--but it helps warm up the heat of
the day sunlight. Second, instant image preview on the LCD allows quick
compensation. Depending on the exact angle of the light I wound up using
either the native matrix metering or compensation up to -1 to keep the
highlights from being blown out--on the white race cars in particular. |
Nikon D1X, 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S w. TC-14E.
While race cars are fast, unlike birds they
normally move in a straight line.
|
My initial intent was to determine which camera made the best tool for racing
photography, but by the end I was truly torn. The D1X provides an awesome
5.4MPixel image which is perfect for the poster-size reproductions favored for
many racing photos. But the D1H can capture an image of a speeding car every few
feet, maximizing your chances of getting the perfect motion blur shot. And in
the rare cases where cars lurched off the track and onto the dirt the high speed
of the D1H was the ideal tool for capturing the unique action.
To begin with, I thought I'd report a little of what I
learned about shooting car racing. As a wildlife photographer I'm used to
capturing action. But racing action is more than a little different. First,
you don't get to pick the time of day when races are run. Dawn light is not
an option for most race photography. Next, instead of working to maximize
your shutter speed you need to slow the shutter speed down enough to portray
the motion of the wheels and the car against the background. So motion blur
is an even more critical tool than in bird photography. One big advantage
the race photographer has is that while the cars are moving quickly, they
are usually moving predictably. So instead of having to zig and zag all over
the sky you're tracking the cars along the race course, either in a firm
line or perhaps in a diagonal as the cars slide out through the turns.
Unfortunately, offsetting this advantage are the logistical issues involved
in shooting races which tend to restrict shooters to hand holding or monopod
shooting. |
Nikon D1H, 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S w. TC-14E
|
Having driven the Laguna Seca course before I had a good idea of what to
expect from the cars. But having never seriously photographed a car race I was
eager for some advice. Mike Doran and Kent Kochheiser, both experienced Laguna
Seca shooters and members of this forum, were more than generous with their
photo tips. They gave me thoughts on equipment, shutter speeds, and locations.
Using my own advice, I made sure to travel down the pre-race weekend to capture
the warm up races. Those races highlighted another advantage of digital. I was
able to review the images, show them to the owners, and adapt my shooting
technique before the next race.
Equipment
Nikon D1X, 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S w. TC-14E
|
I used both the D1X and the D1H for the track shots. The D1H
was perfect for grabbing images--even in Raw mode--at a rapid clip, while
the D1X snagged wall-quality high-resolution shots although at a sometimes
frustrating pace. Because of the 1.5 focal length multiplier I was able to
shoot the event with my Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 AF-S zoom. For shots from right
next to the straightaway I was able to use the lens as is, while when I
needed some extra reach for some of the remote turns I added a TC-14E. I
used the AF-S rather than the 80-400VR to get the faster focusing speed.
That choice means that you need to be able to pan steadily at speeds down to
1/80th or so to get an effective motion blur, so make sure your hand holding
technique is in shape! I alternated between using a Gitzo monopod and just
hand holding to get steady shots. I found them both to be effective so be
sure to experiment to decide which is the best for you. |
Shooting Technique
As I've mentioned, motion blur was key. I found that for the Historic cars,
to get motion blur on the short straights required shutter speeds as low as
1/60th of a second. For Formula One cars, which are traveling almost twice as
fast, faster shutter speeds are fine although tracking them is obviously more
work. Speeds as high as 1/250th worked for multiple car action shots in the
corners as the wheels were still blurred. Because I was often shooting in the
glare of the noon Sun I usually used a polarizer to take the edge off the
specular highlights.
While with an F5 you might be able to shoot right off the meter, with the D1X
and D1H it was necessary to dial-in minus compensation in order to avoid blowing
out the highlights. Squinting at the LCD image in the sunlight is not a great
way to figure this out, so the Histogram is an essential tool in determining
whether you've got the right exposure to keep the image within the dynamic range
of the camera.
Locations and Lighting
Just like with wildlife, sunlight shining on the race cars
is an important part of most racing photographs. And unlike with birds,
flash fill isn't a workable solution to having the Sun in the wrong place.
So it's important to thing about when you will be shooting and to pick spots
on the track where the Sun will be high lighting the cars when you need it.
A track map and a compass are invaluable tools as you scout out the track
and shooting positions before the race. A Media credential will get you
close enough to fire away point blank. But if you're not shooting for a well
known racing publication you might be stuck like I was shooting from the
spectator gallery. That means longer glass. With modern lenses it's
certainly possible to pile on the optics to get the shot, but keep in mind
that the more lens you are using the harder it will be to hand hold steadily
enough to get an effective pan for the motion effects you want.
|
Nikon D1X, 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S w. TC-14E
Either the D1X or D1H can rip off short bursts
for capturing car to car action.
|
Raw Mode
I shot in both Raw and JPEG Fine modes with the two cameras. If I'd had
trouble with the white balance Raw mode would have allowed me to correct it more
easily on the computer. However, white balance wasn't an issue so both modes
produced equivalent results from that perspective. Obviously the high-resolution
output features of Nikon Capture, Bibble and Qimage Pro allow me to produce
larger files from the Raw mode images, so for poster size reproductions I'm
happy to have some of the shots as NEFs.
The only odd thing I found was that in some cases the software was defaulting
to a blue-green tint on the Raw images. This has also been reported by others
and must be some oddity with the D1X and D1H file format. A quick click on
"Click White" in Bibble to reset the white point and the images all snapped back
into normal color. I suspect there will soon be a fix for this relatively minor
incompatibility between the cameras and the Raw image processing software.
Conclusions
Nikon D1X, 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S w. TC-14E
For peak action, like when a car goes off the track,
make sure you've got frames left in the buffer.
|
So, what about the cameras? Both the D1X and D1H made great
showings. For auto racing, the resolution of the D1X is compelling almost all
the time. It provides the large file size for posters or other large prints.
But when the action unfolds it's great to be able to rattle off a long
sequence of shots from the D1H to maximize your chances of capturing the peak
of action. Perhaps the only drawback to these cameras is the frequent problem
with dust on the CCD. If anything the D1X seems more prone to this than the D1
and D1H. The demo D1X I used for this shoot was no exception. Even though it
is only a couple weeks old it came with several visible dust spots on the CCD.
Whichever camera you choose, or if you choose to shoot with
both, you'll be in good shape with one of the new Nikons if you're looking to
capture the high points of an auto race.--David Cardinal.
|
|
|